Extract from Part Three of 'Why Adventure?'
OUTDOOR ADVENTURE WITH YOUNG PEOPLE AT RISK
18. AIMS AND OUTCOMES OF OUTDOOR ADVENTURE INTERVENTIONS: SUMMARY
Prevention
18.1 Improvements caused by some applications of outdoor adventure in
dimensions of self-concept, locus of control and in socialisation with
peers and adults are likely to contribute to the process of healthy
adolescent development. This may assist in diverting near delinquents
and temporary delinquents from offending. School or community based
enrichment programmes using developmental activities that appeal to
young people, may help to reduce the prevalence of adverse factors in
young people's lives (for example, school failure, bullying, teenage
pregnancy, intra-familial conflict, removal to residential care
settings).
18.2 Developmental prevention schemes that emphasise the enhancement of
cognitive and social cognitive functioning in young people, whether
they be non-delinquents, near or temporary delinquents or persistent
delinquents, may be particularly effective in preventing and reducing
offending behaviours. These findings may provide a basis for developing
a clear rationale for the role of outdoor adventure in prevention
schemes.
Rehabilitation
18.3 In order to
reduce offending significantly, an emphasis upon enhanced pro-social
and non-delinquent self-conceptions is necessary, alongside
improvements in reasoning skills and social cognitive functioning. This
is particularly true for persistent or serious young delinquents and
offenders. Gains in pro-social self concept may be best achieved
through close involvement with non-delinquents. This involvement may be
provided by adult staff, but close association with non-delinquent
peers seems to be of equal if not more importance in achieving this
outcome.
18.4 As yet no clear rationales appear to exist for the role of outdoor
adventure in rehabilitation. Some caution may be necessary in
developing a rationale based on the above findings. In particular,
outcomes of improved cognitive and social cognitive functioning appear
to be dependent on an intensity of provision and an integrity of
treatment process that may not be easy to replicate in all outdoor
adventure settings.
18.5 Outdoor adventure applications that create 'cognitive dissonance'
may enhance opportunities for cognitive and social cognitive
development. Nevertheless many applications of outdoor adventure may be
more readily utilised as an adjunctive provision alongside
community-based cognitive and social cognitive training.
Therapeutic treatment
18.6 In the therapeutic treatment of emotionally or behaviourally
disturbed young people, a more intensive developmental intervention is
required. In this context, certain applications of outdoor adventure
may potentially be valuable.
18.7 Improvements in self-concept and in social cognitive functioning
may help to alleviate emotional or behavioural difficulties experienced
by young people at risk from factors other than delinquency. However,
caution is required in the development a rationale for this therapeutic
application of outdoor adventure. These are evolving abroad, notably in
the USA (surveyed in
Brocklebank, 1993), but at present only a very small amount of 'adventure therapy' practice appears to take place in the UK.
Adjunctive resource
18.8 Outdoor adventure with young people in trouble or at risk appears
to be best used as an adjunctive resource to long term community-based
provision appropriate to an individual young person's needs.
Assessment of needs
18.9 Some outdoor adventure, especially residential
programmes, may be effective in assessing young people's needs for
future intervention or follow-up. The communal setting, novel and
challenging activities, and intense small group experiences combine to
reveal characteristics which may not emerge in conventional treatment
settings.
Group development
18.10 Small group participation in enjoyable outdoor
adventure appears to improve individual socialisation which in turn may
assist conflict resolution. Shared participation in challenging
adventure activities can result in improved understanding, trust and
communication between young participants and between young people and
adult staff..
18.11 Although these findings are based only on anecdotal evidence,
further research into the generalised potential of outdoor adventure in
this area seems unnecessary. However, anecdotal evidence also provides
examples of outdoor adventure experiences that have been
counterproductive or divisive. Practice may therefore benefit from
further research to determine the programme settings, styles and
activities, and the characteristics, qualities and levels of
involvement of staff that help to achieve desired outcomes (see fig
13). An examination of aspects of inappropriate programming and
staffing would also be beneficial.
Responsibility
18.12 Programmes that enable young participants to be
self-determining are more likely to result in positive developmental
outcomes than those which impose rigid safety and behavioural
regulations. Outdoor adventure programmes can provide opportunities for
young people to be involved in programme planning, in establishing
group norms, in group maintenance, and in communal 'chores'. They can
also offer opportunities for young people to be involved in processes
of monitoring and assessment, in the identification of personal 'goals'
and in the determination of subsequent interventions and follow-up.